Dragos Nicolae Cazacu vs Hien Pham Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cazacu vs Pham analysis and find out who is favored!
Dragos Nicolae Cazacu vs Hien Pham Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Cazacu 1 - 0 Pham
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cazacu has won 46.53% of points on his second serve, while Pham has won 47.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cazacu, in recent form, has won 53.33% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pham has won 46.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.72% and 29.09% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cazacu has saved 54.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pham has saved 58.02% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cazacu has won 45.45% of matches played (W/L 25/ 30), with Pham winning 56% (W/L 14/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cazacu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 45/ 44), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Pham has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 19/ 24), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 34% (W/L 12/ 23).
- Player level: In the last year, Cazacu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.17% of matches (W/L 25/ 28), where as Pham has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56% of matches (W/L 14/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cazacu winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cazacu winning 2 and Pham winning 0. The last match between Cazacu and Pham was at the M15 Antalya, 05-12-2023, Q3, Clay with Dragos Nicolae Cazacu getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cazacu and Pham have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cazacu winning 0 times and Pham 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cazacu winning 0, and Pham 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cazacu has played against opponents with an average rank of 82.02 while Pham has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cazacu has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pham has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cazacu has converted 47.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pham has converted 45.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Dragos Nicolae Cazacu
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
Hien Pham
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
49% (45-46)
Career Total W/L
40% (31-47)
60% (15-10)
YTD W/L
59% (10-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Dragos Nicolae Cazacu | Hien Pham |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:12:0 | 1:12:0 |
1st Serve % | 67% (34/51) | 71% (37/52) |
1st Serve Win% | 71% (24/34) | 49% (18/37) |
2nd Serve Win% | 59% (10/17) | 33% (5/15) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 50% (1/2) |
Return Points W% | 56% (29/52) | 33% (17/51) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-1 |
Dragos Nicolae Cazacu
Player
Hien Pham
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Dragos Nicolae Cazacu | Hien Pham |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 60% (15/10) | 59% (10/7) |
Sets Win/Loss | 58% (31/22) | 58% (22/16) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (289/243) | 53% (194/170) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
Clay Win/Loss | 60% (15/10) | 57% (8/6) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.03 | 0.03 |
Aces Total | 8 | 6 |
DFs per game | 0.1 | 0.09 |
DFs Total | 25 | 15 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 41.36 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 66% (666/1005) | 70% (340/487) |
1st Serve W% | 60% (399/666) | 60% (203/340) |
2nd Serve W% | 44% (149/339) | 46% (67/147) |
BPs Won% Total | 51% (54/106) | 45% (17/38) |
Return Pts W% | 45% (405/910) | 36% (168/471) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 60% (15/10) | 59% (10/7) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (15/25) | 59% (10/17) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 50% (2/4) |
1st set W, W | 100% (13/13) | 89% (9/8) |
1st set W, L | 0% (13/0) | 11% (9/1) |
1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 25% (8/2) |
Dragos Nicolae Cazacu Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-4 4-6 13-11 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 3-6 6-4 12-10 | H2H | |||
QF |
Dragos Nicolae Cazacu
Player
Stefan Peter Hampe
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
31 of
38)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Stefan Adrian Andreescu
Player
Dragos Nicolae Cazacu
76%
(
68 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
51 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Dragos Nicolae Cazacu
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dragos Nicolae Cazacu
Player
Markus Molder
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Hien Pham Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Paul Werren
Player
Hien Pham
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Hien Pham
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
28 of
37)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
56
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Hien Pham
Player
Elgin Khoeblal
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Berk Ilkel
Player
Hien Pham
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
5-7 6-4 10-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 5-7 7-6(5) 10-8 | H2H | |||
QF |
Gian Marco Ortenzi
Player
Hien Pham
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
49
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 3-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Hien Pham
Player
Shenglin Zhuo
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more